Apr 24 2013

A Victory Already Won

by Don Rodgers

iStockDavidGoliath

David walked into camp. His fellow Israelites quaking in fear. He can’t believe they’re letting this bully scare them. It’s EXACTLY how I feel. He knows God can do it through him. So he just steps up in faith and fights. And takes out the bully. It’s past time to stop the bullies in America. ~ mm

This last weekend, I was feeling pretty run down as we saw martial law imposed with little objection in a major US city to capture just one man. The majority party in Denver continues to hammer at our liberties bent on using the remaining 16 days of the session to inflict more harm on our families and businesses making reversing the damage all but impossible. News story after story reflects the collapse of our culture, radicalization in our classrooms, and a national blindness to events abroad.

All this and it just did not seem the people were “getting” what is occurring around them. The normalcy bias seemed stronger than ever and the means to fight back appeared more limited than ever before, but then I received an e-mail that said, “David prevailed over the Philistine with a sling and a stone, and struck the Philistine and killed him. There was no sword in the hand of David”.

The “fight” really isn’t ours alone and the “profound effect of seeing God’s power work on our behalf is that our confidence is renewed to enter the fray.” This fight is temporary as our victory is already secure. America is founded on Truth, the natural law, and on Gods insight given to the men and women put in one place at a specific time in history to bring to the world the light that is America. It is a gift willed to us through blood and sacrifice.

Many have chosen to turn from that light, but there are enough to ensure it is not turned out. It is a struggle to stand against what is coming our way, but “our confidence is renewed to enter the fray.” We do not need a sword to win a victory that is already ours. We just need Faith and a fierce unwillingness to surrender what has been willed to us.

———————–

Don Rodgers


Mar 11 2013

Getting Inside Colorado Democrat Senator John Morse’s Head

by Bob Adelmann

"...only a cleaning of our whole society can remove this sickness [that we need more guns] from our souls. Cleansing a sickness from our souls doesn't come easily. It's gruesome." ~ Colorado Senator John Morse (D)  Photo Wikimedia Commons

“…only a cleaning of our whole society can remove this sickness [that we need more guns] from our souls. Cleansing a sickness from our souls doesn’t come easily. It’s gruesome.” ~ Colorado Senator John Morse (D) Photo Wikimedia Commons

Now that his favorite piece of gun control legislation has been pulled from consideration it’s worth taking the time to ask: what was John Morse thinking? I’m not meaning that in a pejorative sense. I mean I really would like to know what’s what’s going on inside of his head that he would consider a bill like this, much less sponsor and promote it.

You can find the text of his bill, Senate Bill 196, here.

The King James version of the Holy Scriptures is helpful. Matthew 7:20 says “Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them.” And I’m assuming for our purposes that he drafted the bill, or at the very least had an intimate understanding of what he was proposing.

The bill is based on a number of assumptions. This is from the bill itself:

The General Assembly hereby finds and declares:

(b) Military-style assault weapons are a common thread linking the recent mass shootings of Newtown, Oak Creek, Aurora, Colorado, and others…

Except that they weren’t. Not in the Newtown shooting. Not in the Aurora, Colorado shooting. What was used in the Aurora shooting was, according to the New York Times, was ” a semiautomatic variation of the military’s M-16 rifle,” which is, properly defined, an assault rifle which Wikipedia correctly defines as  “a selective fire (selective between automatic, semi-automatic, and burst fire) rifle that … are the standard service rifles in most modern armies.”

Not in the Oak Creek, Wisconsin, Sikh Temple shooting. The weapon used was a 9mm semi-automatic handgun which Morse’s bill specifically excludes.

Morse’s bill states further:

(c) Because these weapons were originally intended for combat and were specifically designed to kill large numbers of people in a short period of time, they made it possible for the shooters in those tragedies to kill or injure between nine and seventy people in a single incident.

Except that they weren’t. Semi-automatic weapons are, by definition, designed to fire one round per squeeze of the trigger. I can find in no manufacturers’ sales literature any reference to these weapons being “designed to kill large numbers of people in a short period of time.” The most I can find is an oblique reference to self-defense purposes. This is from Ruger:

The new Ruger® Guide Gun combines features from several of Ruger’s most popular rifles to produce a high performance, feature-rich hunting rifle that is ready for whatever conditions and game come your way. (my emphasis)

The best I can tell is that Morse conjured this in his mind.

His bill goes on in an a reference, I assume, to the right to own firearms guaranteed in both the Colorado and the US Constitutions:

(d) Any private benefit for persons to own such weapons must be weighed against the greater danger that they pose to the public. (my emphasis)

Firearms are inanimate objects. How can they pose a “danger … to the public”? And who determines “private benefit?”

Then comes the real purpose:

(e) The right to manufacture, sell, or own assault weapons must carry with it some of the responsibility for damage, injury, and death that results from the discharge of that weapon. (again, my emphasis)

But they already do. Wrongful death laws go back to 1846 in this country.

It’s no wonder that the National Rifle Association said his bill is “a backdoor to banning legal firearms and is in direct violation of the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.”

All I can figure is that he wants to outlaw ownership of these weapons for other reasons than those stated. And that is fraud.

So I find Morse’s complaint that “the gun lobby has actually argued we need more guns and managed to convince Coloradoans that they will lose their guns if we impose even reasonable restrictions on firearms,” grossly hypocritical and misleading. Instead I am thankful enough common sense still reigned in the Senate to cause this bill to be dropped down the memory hole.

My conclusion? Morse is a fraudulent hypocrite (or a hypocritical fraud, take your pick) and as a consequence a danger to society. He needs to be replaced.

—————————————

A graduate of Cornell University and a former investment advisor, Bob is a regular contributor to The New American magazine and blogs frequently at www.LightFromTheRight.com, primarily on economics and politics. He can be reached at badelmann@thenewamerican.com.